So I’ve been playing around with IronPython for a little while now and have been having a lot of fun learning to combine dynamic and static programming techniques. I haven’t tried to do anything too fancy yet, but using an IronPython powered spreadsheet to create a Texas Holdem Monte Carlo Simulator did show that you can get reasonably good performance just hacking away at a problem, even when there are a few extra levels of indirection, binding, and code generation added into the mix.
Lately I’ve been keeping my Google Reader RSS feed full of cartoons, news, and blog posts, and I just barely got around to digesting Bruno Terkaly’s break down of C# 4.0 and the Dynamic Language Runtime. He uses his blog to do presentations, so there usually are a lot of diagrams and a few key paragraphs of text, but if you have been keeping up with the developments then the pictures really help to pull things into perspective.
This post in particular was expanding on Jim Hugunin’s talk about the use of Dynamic Languages in Microsoft .NET from PDC 2008 almost a year ago. I had seen Anders Hejlsberg’s presentation about The Future of C#, but I hadn’t had a chance to watch the video about the DLR until today. If anyone is wondering why there is so much hype about the DLR, the new Dynamic type in C#/VB.NET, or the emergence of IronPython and IronRuby, I suggest taking a look at both of these videos, as they show what in my mind is the future of programming. These technologies have been picking up steam over the last year or two, but when .NET 4.0 and VS 2010 ship in the near future, I expect to see a lot more applications taking advantage of this new powerful platform.